Letter to the Editor
Malaysians Against Moral Policing
25 April 2005

To the Editor:

In light of the recent debate over our call to repeal religious and municipal laws that attempt to regulate moral behaviour, Malaysians Against Moral Policing (MAMP) would like to clarify and reaffirm our position.

It goes without saying that there should be standards of decency and morality in the public sphere. We recognise that individual rights are not absolute, but subject to limitations based on respect for the
rights of others and our collective responsibilities to the community.

We agree that the government has a vital role to play in shaping and strengthening public morality in Malaysia. But it does not follow that the government should have the sole authority to set these standards and compel adherence to them.

Public morality cannot be defined or imposed by the government alone or by a small group of individuals, regardless of their political, academic or religious credentials. Attempts to do so are
anti-democratic and prone to failure.

This is as true whether a massive state apparatus is used to enforce moral laws, such as in Iran under their Islamic Republic or Afghanistan under the Taliban or where state resources are used in more subtle ways to advance a narrow moral viewpoint, such as in the US by right-wing evangelical Christians or in India by extremist Hindu puritans.

All Malaysian citizens, therefore, should play a role in defining public morality in a way that is consistent with an open and democratic process.

Such moral standards should be conceived more broadly than how we dress or socialise, and should include respect for others, ethics and public accountability in governance, disdain for corruption, and a
striving to live in a socially responsible way.

In the past, implementation of morality laws has often led to public outcry because there was little consensus on what constitutes a violation of public morality. Morality fundamentally involves personal
choices based on one's ethical and religious commitments. Moreover, society's values evolve over time, adapting to historical and cultural changes.

Together, these influences lead to differences of opinion within our multi-religious and multi-cultural society, not only between Muslims and people of other faiths, but also within the Muslim community
itself.

Therefore, any attempt to define public morality, especially when it is codified into law, must take into consideration these diverse values and standards. The search for a single right answer will always
remain elusive precisely because of this diversity. To limit the scope of debate would be counter-productive and unnatural.

Some have argued that weaknesses in the implementation of religious and municipal laws should not be a basis for repealing the laws themselves. However, the use of coercion to regulate behaviour is
neither effective nor enlightened, no matter how well-meaning or well-implemented.

Instead of relying on punishment to induce good behaviour - especially among young people - the government should adopt supportive policies to ensure individuals, families and communities develop the capacity to promote moral behaviour through education, discussion, family involvement and positive role modelling.

In addition, the government and civil society should engage in ongoing consultation with youth and families to understand the needs of today's young people and to help them learn the best path towards becoming responsible members of society.

Through an open, inclusive and collective effort, all Malaysians can together focus on promoting a common foundation of moral values that encompasses the religious and cultural diversity of our society, rather than letting the government use its power to enforce a separate set of standards among the Muslim population.

We reiterate our position that religious and municipal laws must be reviewed with a commitment to repeal provisions that overlap with the federal Penal Code, that contravene basic Islamic principles, that are in conflict with the Constitution, or that provide excessive latitude for interpretation and abuse by enforcement officers.

The review and revision process must represent the broad spectrum of communities within a democratic, multi-racial, multi-religious, and pluralist Malaysia.

Malaysians Against Moral Policing

Related Articles:

• Joint Press Statement - The State Has No Role In Policing Morality
• Resources, Malaysians Against Moral Policing
• Joint Press Statement - JAWI Raid
• Talking Points - 'Kay Poh' Boys & Tell-tale Girls