
|
MEDIA RELEASE: April 5, 2001 DISCRIMINATION AGAINST FOREIGN SPOUSES This is a common and age-old problem faced by foreign women who are
married to Malaysian men. Although foreign wives are eligible for Permanent
Residency (PR) status (which, incidentally, is not granted to foreign
men who are married to Malaysian women), they are completely dependent
upon their husbands in the application process and in the renewal of
their yearly social pass.
This is because the Immigration Department procedures require the husbands
to be present during the application, and to give their consent to their
wives' application for PR status.
If the husbands refuse to support their applications for PR status
and their social visas expire, this structure leaves the foreign wives
without recourse. The significance of this is especially pertinent when
there is a crisis between the couple, abuse, separation or divorce during
the application process period, or as in the case above, where the husband
walks out of the relationship due to an alleged extra-marital affair.
Article 15(1) of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia provides that
foreign wives apply for Malaysian citizenship after remaining in the
country for two years (note: again, a corresponding eligibility is not
extended to foreign husbands of Malaysian women) and choose to reside
in Malaysia permanently. However, the reality remains that these women
often face delays in their application process, and in some cases, the
processing has taken over ten years. This was discovered through Women
Aid's Organisation's (WAO) research in the compilation of its CEDAW
Baseline Report on Marriage and Divorce. During the period of application
process, the husbands have the power to exert undue control over their
foreign wives due to the wives' dependency upon them in this matter. Aside from the delays, the requirement of the husbands' consent and
presence puts the women in a frightening position especially if they
have children who are Malaysian citizens. The women are at the risk
of deportation, regardless of the fact that they might have already
lived in Malaysia for several years. This in turn means that they might
not be able to be with their children and care for them because they
do not have joint guardianship over their children. This means that
a mother's right to be with her children is completely subjected to
the father's consent and support. In some instances, this may even result
in women remaining in abusive relationships. As found by MCA bureau
head Michael Chong (as quoted in the news report), "many local men make
use of immigration laws as a convenient way to dump their foreign spouses".
How does this reflect a woman's position in her family? As seen, the
provisions and operations of this law have effectively curtailed her
right of choice to remain within a marriage. Her right to her children
has also been notably compromised through the denial of her right to
remain in the country. The fact that the operations of this law gives
and allows the men so much control over the women and their fate is
discrimination.
Even though there is a concern by the government on foreigners who
may be marrying Malaysian citizens merely for the sake of attaining
a green card, the approach to this concern should be free from gender
biasness. It is unfortunate enough that foreign husbands of Malaysian
women are not even granted the eligibility to PR status or citizenship,
the operations of current legislation should not promote an unequal
standing ground between the husband and wife within the family.
This contravenes the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of
Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) of which Malaysia has ratified
to in 5 July 1995. The basic legal norm of the convention is the prohibition
of all forms of discrimination against women. This fundamental equality
in the right to nationality, particularly after marriage, is preserved
under Article 9 of the convention that has been wholly accepted by the
Malaysian government upon its ratification. By acceding to the Convention,
Malaysia has committed to undertake a series of measures to end discrimination
against women in all forms, and this includes incorporating the principle
of equality of men and women in their legal system, abolish all discriminatory
laws and adopt appropriate ones prohibiting discrimination against women.
A Malaysian society that upholds humanitarian values should take into
consideration the effect that Immigration laws have on both women and
children. Both the mother and father should have an equal opportunity
to be with their children, and in the event of a separation, this should
not be decided over a law that allows for the man to exert a deciding
control over the fate of the woman. The women face deportation because
of unjust Malaysian men who use the law to their advantage. The women
should be able to apply for PR status irrespective of her husband's
approval by virtue of the fact that she has given birth and have stayed
in Malaysia for 'X' number of years. The provisions of the law should
facilitate women who have married Malaysian men to be able to apply
for PR status or citizenship because of the above reasons should they,
due to circumstances beyond their control, be left in a lurch or are
even widowed. It is unjust to expect these women to just leave the country
after she has invested so much in the country.
More importantly, such laws that directly discriminate against women should be re-examined and reformed to eliminate the inequality that it provides for. Jaclyn
Kee
Related sites: |
| WAO is a registered society
with tax exemption status under Registrar of Societies. WAO is a member of
the Joint Action Group against Violence Against Women and an affiliate
member of the National Council of Women's Organisations and the Malaysian
Aids Council. copyright © 2000. WAO. |